The study suggests a new potential health risk from disturbances in the body's 24-hour internal clock, specifically the sleep-wake cycle, according to study author Dr. The findings were presented Saturday at the virtual annual meeting of The Endocrine Society. Nearly half said they were morning people, 21 were night people and 133 had no strong preference either way.Ĭompared to the other women in the study, night owls had a three times higher risk of preeclampsia, and a four times higher risk of their newborns being treated in a neonatal intensive care unit. The new study included 305 women with gestational diabetes during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. It also raises the baby's risk of growing too large in the womb or having breathing problems after birth. Gestational diabetes increases the mother's risk of premature delivery and preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced high blood pressure). WEDNESDAY, Ma(HealthDay News) - Women who develop diabetes during pregnancy have a higher risk of complications for themselves and their babies if they're night owls instead of early birds, a new study finds. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.Įditorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Įditorial and Fact-Checking Policy HealthDay Editorial Commitment. Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.Peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations. Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in.All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our.Team of industry experts to ensure accuracy. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. Krainin was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, an honor reserved for sleep doctors who’ve made significant contributions to the field in education, research and service. Krainin says, “You can’t really fake valid-looking snoring on a sleep study, and attempting to fake obstructive apneas - if you could even figure out how to approach this - would probably be pretty obvious to an expert reviewer.” In 2013 Dr. So try doing that, while lying in bed, for at least six hours – let’s say, 10 times an hour.īut remember, you’d have to hold your breath past the point that you did when you were a child (or adult) playing breath-holding games with friends.īut there’s more to faking a sleep apnea test than lying still and awake for at least six hours and repeatedly holding your breath long enough to induce gasping.ĭr. That’s more uncomfortable than you ever were as a child when you’d time with a stop watch how long you could hold your breath or see if you could swim across an entire swimming pool underwater without coming up once for air. Next, assuming that you CAN just lie there for six, let alone eight hours straight, eyes closed but awake, without going batty, you’d have to frequently stop breathing long enough to become very uncomfortable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |